The Ghana Catholic Bishops’ Conference has defended the Church’s active engagement in national discourse, asserting that its involvement in public issues is a divine responsibility rather than an act of political activism.
The Conference’s response follows recent public commentary attributed to Mary Awusi, who cautioned that Apostle Eric Nyamekye could be regarded as a politician if he continues to speak on national concerns such as illegal mining.
In a statement dated Tuesday, April 28, 2026, and signed by its President, Matthew Kwasi Gyamfi, the Bishops emphasised that the Church’s voice on national matters is grounded in its spiritual and moral mandate.
“The Church, by her nature and divine mandate, cannot remain silent in the face of moral and social concerns. When issues arise that threaten human dignity, the integrity of creation, or the common good, such as the grave harm caused by illegal mining, the Church has both the right and the duty to speak. This is not partisan politics; it is a moral responsibility rooted in the Gospel,” the statement said.
The Conference acknowledged the importance of maintaining a clear distinction between religious and political roles in a democratic society but stressed that such boundaries should not suppress the Church’s responsibility to act as a moral compass.
“The Church does not seek power but strives to illuminate public life with truth. When she speaks on justice, peace, and care for creation, she does so as a moral guide concerned for all,” the statement added.
While noting reports that Dr. Awusi has since apologised, the Bishops expressed concern that such remarks could undermine respectful public discourse and restrict space for ethical engagement.
“Statements that equate moral witness with political partisanship risk narrowing the space for ethical reflection,” the Conference cautioned, urging public officials to foster dialogue rooted in mutual respect.
The Bishops also commended members of the Christian community for their measured and respectful response to the controversy, describing it as a sign of responsible leadership.
They further called on clergy and lay leaders to remain committed to truth and moral clarity, while urging political actors to remain open to the contributions of faith-based institutions in national development.